Beyond the Screen of Thought: Radical Non-Duality and Philosophy Examples in Everyday Life

Explore the absolute through radical non-duality. Discover why life is a dance, not a journey, and how the separate self is merely a film on the screen.

We often find ourselves trapped in the noise of a world that feels increasingly superficial and vulgar, searching for a depth that seems to slip through our fingers the moment we try to grasp it. We look for transformative experiences in books, in travel, or in commercialized wellness practices, yet the thirst remains. But who is it that is thirsty? And what are we actually looking for? When we look at various philosophy examples throughout history, we see a recurring attempt to build a ladder to the truth, a structural hierarchy of concepts designed to reach the absolute. Yet, the absolute is not the top rung of a ladder. It is the ground upon which the ladder stands—a ground that, as Meister Eckhart suggested, is actually a "grunt" that is "upgrunt," a bottomless abyss. There is a common misunderstanding that we are on a this moment, a journey from a state of ignorance to a state of grace. But enlightenment is not a destination. It is not a place you arrive at after years of meditation or study. If we view life as a journey, we are always living for a future sense that never arrives. We treat our lives like a race to the finish line, but as Alan Watts pointed out, the point of a musical composition is not to reach the final note. If it were, composers would only write finales. The music is the playing of it; the dance is the dancing of it. When we move from point A to point B in a dance, we aren't trying to get to B as quickly as possible. We are simply moving. The wonder lies in the spontaneous flowering of action without a "me" who decides to act. Think of a blade of grass. In its fragility and its fleeting nature, that single blade of grass is the entire the absolute in all times. We often think of space as something "inside" us—a small area in the heart—and the vast the absolute as something "outside." But it is the same space. There is no division between the internal and the external; there is only a fullness that is the absolute. Every ephemeral form we perceive, every flicker of discomfort, every smile, is actually the totality. It is like the pixels on a computer screen. When you watch a film, every tiny detail, every color, every movement is nothing but the screen in its entirety. The screen is inseparable from the film, yet it remains untouched by the drama. We are so accustomed to the separate self that we believe we are the ones doing the looking, the ones choosing, the ones suffering the consequences of our actions. We build ideologies and moralities—rigid structures of words that attempt to freeze the complexity of becoming. These philosophy examples of moral codes often become the very things that stifle life. If we say "do not steal," we create a stagnant rule. But life is more complex. Are we not "stealing" life every time we eat? Are we not stealing the time of others?

Read full article on Silence Please